More Abortion Thoughts
In the very large arena of the abortion debate, people like to throw around the phrase "right to life." I'm curious as to where this concept comes from. It definitely does not come from the Bible. God smites so many heathens in that book and sends them to hell that you would think Christians would be looking up all the time in fear of the inevitable. I addressed the concept of an infant's "right to life" some in my previous post, but I had some more ideas concerning it and thought I would bring them up here. Sure, in the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson wrote that certain rights were unalienable and were held to be self-evident. These rights were "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." Of course, in the same sentence, Jefferson would have us believe that all men were "created" equal, by a "Creator." Now, I think it is fairly well known that Thomas Jefferson despised religion, and that he said many things concerning Christianity that would leave one to believe he was not a religious man. It is also quite ironic that a man who owns slaves can write about the equality of a race, and unalienable rights to happiness and liberty. But, beyond the obvious hypocrisy of what he wrote, we have to analyze it for the merit of what truth it ultimately holds.
In order for a right to be truly unalienable, I think it must stand to reason that such a right must be based on an irrefutable truth. If someone is standing there with you, having a conversation about politics, they are undeniably alive. This is truth. The problem inherent in the concept of the "right to life" of the unborn, is that it is a debatable subject as to when that life actually begins. Christians would have us believe that life "begins" at conception, from the moment the sperm fertilizes the egg. But different people of different beliefs have different ideas as to when a fetus can actually be considered alive. Therefore, all people can not be held to the belief system of one specific group. I, for one, think that a fetus should not be considered alive, until it has grown enough that it can fight for its own survival, it can live outside the womb. But different people hold other ideas on this subject. Think about this, when a zygote is first beginning to form, it is little more than a cluster of cells in the womb. What else starts out as a cluster of cells in the human body? Cancer. And we do everything in our power to kill cancer if it starts growing inside us. Further more, on some levels I think the idea of a "right to life" is just absurd. Being alive, and staying alive in this world, requires too much random chance for someone to ever think that they have a "right" to be alive. Just getting in a car and driving to work safely each day is not a guarantee. From conception, to old age, every moment, we are susceptible to the decisions of other persons and random events that could end our life without warning, and without any way for us to do anything to stop it, whether it be a mother deciding to terminate a pregnancy, or a man deciding to run a red light. Without a doubt, it is wrong for someone to premeditate the murder of someone else, because that is a decision that could be prevented, but as I have said before, in the case of an unborn fetus, most abortions take place before the person thinks of the zygote as an actual living being.
The problem here, is that Christians want the entire country to be under the rule of their personal belief system. It is a simple matter of the majority versus the minority. In matters of law, this may be a good way for deciding things, but in matters of faith it is not. This type of mentality leads to persecution of the minority, and was a key reason as to why the Separatists pilgrims left England to come to America in the first place. This is why in this country there is supposed to be a separation of church and state. But the problem is this becomes harder and harder to do when so many of your citizens prescribe to the same religious doctrines. We are quite simply on the verge of becoming an unofficial religious state, which, in a country that is supposedly founded upon religious freedom, goes against the very nature of our nation. But think about it, most people in the country are Christian, therefore, most politicians are Christian, so, the values bestowed upon the belief system of that religion, are being inherently woven into the country's legislature. In areas like abortion, this shows more obviously, because it is an area where strong deviations from Christian beliefs can easily be found. These areas are where the minority must stand up and make themselves heard to prevent total control from being established by the Christian religious majority in our society. It is simply not right for one group to force their religious based values on an entire nation of people.
For Christian readers who may see this, I have a couple scenarios that I have thought out that might make you think a bit about the abortion issue:
1. You wake up tomorrow and Christianity is the minority religion. The majority is now Druidism. Suddenly, it is against the law to chop down trees, because they are considered sacred. All furniture, and other things made from wood in the past, must now be synthetically created materials. Even firewood must only be synthetic. But this law is based of course on the religious doctrines of the Druids, which you do not share. The synthetic firewood sold at the store is rather expensive, and it has been a hard winter. You can't really afford to buy the synthetic wood this paycheck, but you live near a wooded area. Since you do not share the Druid belief, would you chop a tree down behind your house if you knew you would not get caught?
2. Satanism becomes a majority religious belief in the country and they legalize the sacrifice of animals for their religious rituals and say everyone must keep animals at their homes for future sacrifices. Mormonism becomes the majority religion and says all curse words and sexually explicit content must be edited out of all films shown in the USA. As a member of the minority, would you feel these laws would infringe upon your right to not kill an animal, or your right to see an uncensored film?
Basically, this is a country founded upon freedom of religion, a melting pot of cultures and different ideas. This freedom allows its citizens to practice whatever religious beliefs they may have, including the right to have no beliefs at all. Christians should remember this fundamental truth, and stop trying to make the whole world in their own image.


3 Comments:
hummmm.......
Thomas Jefferson did not "despise" religion. He was turned off by organized religion, but his attempts to get to the true core of Christianity (Jeffersonian bible...Jefferson wanted to rework the bible himself, particularly the new testament, to remove things that obviously were not Christ teachings but later additions and so created the Jeffersonian bible) could easily argue that he was a very religious man, just not organized religion. Most believe he was a "deist" and a "humanist" which is to say that he believed in a creator, and the importance of human caring for one another. As a deist he would have believed in a god that functions either by creating or within the natural workings of the world. That he was very ani-clergy and organized religion though is pretty well established.
Jefferson's own self conflict with his views and his owning of slaves is also pretty well established. He was a conflicted person.
Perhaps cancer has a right to life?
Yeah, this is the same point as outlawing meat. Could you outlaw the killing of cows because the country has hindus in it? Try selling that to the McD lobby.
I fall back to the, A vegetarian can try to convince me a cow is a person too. A hindu can try to convince me that it is my great-grandma. I'm still going to think he's delicious and as long as it is a matter of belief than it's important I can eat that f'er. Sorry.
I guess what I am saying is that every day plenty of Christians look the other way for "right to life" issues because it doesn't match their belief system.
"Cows are people too" is a "right to life" belief that is ignored.
The death penalty is most certainly a potential right to life issue, as some feel all life is too sacred for any man to take.
As I stated before as well, healthcare is certainly a "right to life" issue that many Christians ignore because they only believe in the right to life as long as it doesn't increase my taxes.
Like I said last time, the indoctrination of a belief into law is the suppression of a different belief and a violation of the freedom of religion.
That is why it is important for a democracy to have an informed and literate electorate. It is important for fair-minded members of the majority to be able to recognize and defend the needs and rights of the minority. Otherwise you just end up with the the tyranny of the majority and mob rule.
To say one is religious, yet not a fan of organized religion is a bit of a oxymoron, since "religion" itself would refer to the organization of said beliefs. Many things he said regarding religion, and the separation of church and state, and how Christianity had poisoned the minds of people, lead me to believe he was not a fan of religion. Being a "deist" as it is known he seemed to be, is one thing, but he did not support Christianity, and thus his leaving out of the terminology of that religion and using the ambiguous terms he used would also lead me to believe he did not like religion, especially Christianity, and his reworkings of the Bible into his own version, were mainly to discredit the one heralded by Christians as fabrication. It was not my intention to write a biopic of Jefferson, merely to state an opinion of what I thought his views were, gleaned from materials I had read about him. But alas, it all means the same thing in the end, Christians can't lay claim to everything just because the word "god" or "creator" may be used.
But thanks Jerry, for apparently being the truth police on my blog now. LOL
Yeah god and creator are very open terms, and Christians who don't come in contact with many other views sometimes forget that the terms apply in other religions too. He didn't say Yahweh, or Jehovah, etc etc...
I could be wrong but I am pretty sure I heard a quote of Jefferson's where he related to someone a great respect for the "philiosophy of Jesus". Much of his reworking of the bible as I understand it was cutting and pasting (he did so literally) of the passages that in our bible today are written in red together and removing all the rest. He most certainly showed great contempt for the clergy. I think if he were filling out a questionnaire on religion today he would mark what we call "spiritual".
I've got a head full of low worth knowledge that comes spilling out like that. I think I'm going to see if I can get a free-lance writing gig on the stuff works web page
Post a Comment
<< Home